What problem do agencies face with AI search?
Clients have started asking about it. They have seen their brand missing from a ChatGPT answer, or a competitor named in an AI Overview, and they want to know what you are doing about it.
Answering that well is hard with the usual tools. Rank trackers do not read AI answers. Standalone AI trackers do not hold the SEO work, the tasks or the reports. So the team ends up copying numbers between three tools and a spreadsheet, for every client. That does not scale past a handful of accounts.
There is also the question of proof. AI answers vary run to run, and clients are right to ask how you know anything changed. You need tracking you can explain and results you can measure.
What do agencies get from Axiom GEO?
One login that covers finding, fixing and reporting, for every client.
- Tracking. AI visibility tracking runs each client's prompts across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. Competitor share of voice shows who is named instead.
- Accuracy. Answer accuracy checks every answer against an approved fact sheet and groups the wrong details into issues with a suggested fix.
- Classic search. Rank tracking, reviews, citations and links sit in the same login.
- Delivery. Work holds the tasks, the evidence and client sign-off, and measures outcomes afterwards.
- Reporting. Client reports go out white labelled, with the numbers re-checked before sending.
Each client has its own workspace, kept apart at the database level. Staff and client logins are separate, and clients see only their own workspace. Staff can keep answer accuracy hidden from client users until they choose to turn it on.
What does a typical month look like?
Most agencies settle into a rhythm like this for each client.
- Review the prompt runs. Check visibility, share of voice and which competitors moved.
- Check accuracy issues. Look at new wrong details, where they came from and which are fixed.
- Pick the work. Send the most useful issues and content opportunities to Work as tasks.
- Deliver. Write, fix and publish, with client sign-off in Work where needed.
- Refresh the prompt set. Add gaps from prompt suggestions and QA Finder questions.
- Report. Build the monthly report, add your recommendations and send it.
The weekly digest email keeps clients in touch between monthly reports, so fewer "any update?" emails land in your inbox.
How do you show a client the work made a difference?
This is where many GEO services fall down. The work gets done, but nobody can say what it changed.
In Work, a task linked to an accuracy issue, a prompt or a page gets a baseline when it starts. The platform then measures later whether the issue cleared, visibility on the prompt rose, the page got cited or clicks rose. Accuracy issues are marked fixed once later answers stop repeating the wrong detail.
It helps to be straight with clients about what this means. AI answers vary from run to run, and tracking is a sample, not a census. No one can guarantee a mention. What you can show is a clear record of what was done and what moved over the following months.
Which plan fits an agency?
It depends on how many clients you run AI search for.
| Plan | Price per month | Clients | Engines and extras |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional | £799 | Up to 3 | ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity, with answer accuracy |
| Premium | £1,499 | Up to 10 | All four engines, answer accuracy, QA Finder and content rewrites |
| Enterprise | Custom | Up to 100 | For larger client books |
Professional suits a small agency testing GEO with its first few clients. Premium suits agencies that have made GEO a regular service, since QA Finder and content rewrites help with the content side. Enterprise is for larger client books. Credits are 1p each and every credit spent is logged, so you can work out the cost of each client's tracking. The pricing page has the full detail.
If you are still working out how to package the service, our guide on selling GEO to clients is a good place to start.